Match statistics snapshot
- KVC Westerlo created the clearer chances on xG (1.60 vs 1.21, Δ 0.39).
- KVC Westerlo fired more attempts (19 vs 10 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Kv Mechelen |
|---|---|---|
| 1.60Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.21 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Kv Mechelen |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 304 | Accurate passes | 309Lead |
| 386 | Total passes | 399Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Kv Mechelen |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Corner kicks | 17Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Kv Mechelen |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 1.55 | Goals prevented | 1.55 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Kv Mechelen |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |