Match statistics snapshot
- KVC Westerlo created the clearer chances on xG (1.31 vs 0.72, Δ 0.59).
- KVC Westerlo fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- OH Leuven was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Oh Leuven |
|---|---|---|
| 1.31Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.72 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Oh Leuven |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 360Lead | Accurate passes | 269 |
| 435Lead | Total passes | 342 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Oh Leuven |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Oh Leuven |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.16 | Goals prevented | -0.16 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Oh Leuven |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.