Match statistics snapshot
- KVC Westerlo created the clearer chances on xG (1.91 vs 1.33, Δ 0.58).
- KVC Westerlo fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- RWDM was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Rwdm |
|---|---|---|
| 1.91Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.33 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Rwdm |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 346 | Accurate passes | 365Lead |
| 435 | Total passes | 452Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Rwdm |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Rwdm |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Rwdm |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.