Match statistics snapshot
- KVC Westerlo created the clearer chances on xG (1.87 vs 0.39, Δ 1.48).
- KVC Westerlo fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- KVC Westerlo was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Standard Liege |
|---|---|---|
| 1.87Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.39 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Standard Liege |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 228 | Accurate passes | 447Lead |
| 307 | Total passes | 544Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Standard Liege |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Standard Liege |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Standard Liege |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.