Match statistics snapshot
- KVC Westerlo created the clearer chances on xG (2.90 vs 1.00, Δ 1.90).
- KVC Westerlo fired more attempts (19 vs 17 shots).
- Standard Liege was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 32%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Standard Liege |
|---|---|---|
| 2.90Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.00 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Shots outside the box | 9 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 17 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Standard Liege |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 259 | Accurate passes | 301Lead |
| 339 | Total passes | 383Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Standard Liege |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Standard Liege |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Standard Liege |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.