Match statistics snapshot
- Gamba Osaka created the clearer chances on xG (1.24 vs 2.48, Δ 1.24).
- Gamba Osaka fired more attempts (22 vs 15 shots).
- Gamba Osaka held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 1.24 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.48Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 62% | Pass accuracy | 73%Lead |
| 162 | Accurate passes | 313Lead |
| 263 | Total passes | 427Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.