Match statistics snapshot
- Kashiwa Reysol created the clearer chances on xG (0.74 vs 1.02, Δ 0.28).
- Kyoto Sanga was more accurate in front of goal (20% on target vs 10%).
- Kyoto Sanga held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Kashiwa Reysol |
|---|---|---|
| 0.74 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.02Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 2Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Kashiwa Reysol |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 63%Lead | Pass accuracy | 59% |
| 223Lead | Accurate passes | 149 |
| 352Lead | Total passes | 252 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Kashiwa Reysol |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Kashiwa Reysol |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Kashiwa Reysol |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.