Match statistics snapshot
- Kashiwa Reysol created the clearer chances on xG (1.58 vs 2.65, Δ 1.07).
- Kashiwa Reysol fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
- Kyoto Sanga held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Kashiwa Reysol |
|---|---|---|
| 1.58 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.65Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Kashiwa Reysol |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 378Lead | Accurate passes | 319 |
| 472Lead | Total passes | 412 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Kashiwa Reysol |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Kashiwa Reysol |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Kashiwa Reysol |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |