Match statistics snapshot
- Machida Zelvia created the clearer chances on xG (0.25 vs 1.83, Δ 1.58).
- Machida Zelvia fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- Kyoto Sanga held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 0.25 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.83Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 284Lead | Accurate passes | 217 |
| 380Lead | Total passes | 316 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |