Match statistics snapshot
- Kyoto Sanga created the clearer chances on xG (1.56 vs 1.38, Δ 0.18).
- Kyoto Sanga fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Nagoya Grampus was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 1.56Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.38 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 73%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 231Lead | Accurate passes | 175 |
| 318Lead | Total passes | 273 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.