Match statistics snapshot
- Kyoto Sanga created the clearer chances on xG (1.36 vs 1.20, Δ 0.16).
- Kyoto Sanga fired more attempts (20 vs 8 shots).
- Shimizu S-pulse was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 1.36Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.20 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 335Lead | Accurate passes | 210 |
| 426Lead | Total passes | 313 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |