Match statistics snapshot
- Vissel Kobe created the clearer chances on xG (0.81 vs 1.68, Δ 0.87).
- Vissel Kobe fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Kyoto Sanga held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 0.81 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.68Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 67%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 237Lead | Accurate passes | 190 |
| 355Lead | Total passes | 299 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.