Match statistics snapshot
- Kyoto Sanga created the clearer chances on xG (1.35 vs 1.04, Δ 0.31).
- Kyoto Sanga fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Kyoto Sanga was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 1.35Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.04 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 224Lead | Accurate passes | 204 |
| 337Lead | Total passes | 311 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.