Match statistics snapshot
- Lahti fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Lahti was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 22%).
- Lahti held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lahti | Statistic | Rops |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 7 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 2 |
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lahti | Statistic | Rops |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lahti | Statistic | Rops |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lahti | Statistic | Rops |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shots | ||
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lahti | Statistic | Rops |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |