Match statistics snapshot
- SJK created the clearer chances on xG (2.40 vs 2.52, Δ 0.12).
- Lahti fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- SJK was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lahti | Statistic | Sjk |
|---|---|---|
| 2.40 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.52Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lahti | Statistic | Sjk |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 370Lead | Accurate passes | 230 |
| 482Lead | Total passes | 314 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lahti | Statistic | Sjk |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lahti | Statistic | Sjk |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lahti | Statistic | Sjk |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.