Match statistics snapshot
- Volos NFC fired more attempts (6 vs 5 shots).
- Lamia was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 83%).
- Lamia held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lamia | Statistic | Volos Nfc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 0 | Shots off target | 1Lead |
| 5 |
| 5 |
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 6Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lamia | Statistic | Volos Nfc |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lamia | Statistic | Volos Nfc |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lamia | Statistic | Volos Nfc |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shots | ||
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lamia | Statistic | Volos Nfc |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | Fouls | 21Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |