Match statistics snapshot
- Lanus created the clearer chances on xG (1.50 vs 0.58, Δ 0.92).
- Lanus was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 29%).
- Argentinos JRS held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lanus | Statistic | Argentinos Jrs |
|---|---|---|
| 1.50Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.58 |
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
| 14 | Total shots | 14 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lanus | Statistic | Argentinos Jrs |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 289 | Accurate passes | 501Lead |
| 372 | Total passes | 580Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lanus | Statistic | Argentinos Jrs |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lanus | Statistic | Argentinos Jrs |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| 2.17 | Goals prevented | 2.17 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lanus | Statistic | Argentinos Jrs |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |