Match statistics snapshot
- Lanus created the clearer chances on xG (1.04 vs 0.71, Δ 0.33).
- Lanus fired more attempts (18 vs 7 shots).
- Independ.
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lanus | Statistic | Independ. Rivadavia |
|---|---|---|
| 1.04Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.71 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lanus | Statistic | Independ. Rivadavia |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 382Lead | Accurate passes | 165 |
| 450Lead | Total passes | 254 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lanus | Statistic | Independ. Rivadavia |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lanus | Statistic | Independ. Rivadavia |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lanus | Statistic | Independ. Rivadavia |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |