Match statistics snapshot
- Instituto Cordoba created the clearer chances on xG (0.71 vs 1.19, Δ 0.48).
- Instituto Cordoba fired more attempts (19 vs 15 shots).
- Instituto Cordoba was more accurate in front of goal (37% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lanus | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 0.71 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.19Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 6 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lanus | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 466Lead | Accurate passes | 255 |
| 554Lead | Total passes | 333 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lanus | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lanus | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.14 | Goals prevented | 0.14 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lanus | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |