Match statistics snapshot
- Lanus created the clearer chances on xG (0.86 vs 0.26, Δ 0.60).
- Lanus fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Lanus was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lanus | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 0.86Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.26 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lanus | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 381Lead | Accurate passes | 297 |
| 467Lead | Total passes | 381 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lanus | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lanus | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.10 | Goals prevented | 0.10 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lanus | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |