Match statistics snapshot
- Las Palmas created the clearer chances on xG (1.25 vs 0.79, Δ 0.46).
- Las Palmas fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- Athletic Club was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Las Palmas | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 1.25Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.79 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Las Palmas | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 548Lead | Accurate passes | 168 |
| 638Lead | Total passes | 256 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Las Palmas | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Las Palmas | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Las Palmas | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.