Match statistics snapshot
- Las Palmas created the clearer chances on xG (1.70 vs 1.54, Δ 0.16).
- Las Palmas fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- Las Palmas held more of the ball (74% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Las Palmas | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.70Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.54 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 4 |
| 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Las Palmas | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 74%Lead | Ball possession | 26% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 649Lead | Accurate passes | 177 |
| 726Lead | Total passes | 254 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Las Palmas | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Las Palmas | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Las Palmas | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |