Match statistics snapshot
- Las Palmas created the clearer chances on xG (1.37 vs 0.76, Δ 0.61).
- Las Palmas fired more attempts (25 vs 8 shots).
- Las Palmas held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Las Palmas | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.37Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.76 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Las Palmas | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 443Lead | Accurate passes | 286 |
| 514Lead | Total passes | 353 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Las Palmas | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Las Palmas | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.91 | Goals prevented | 0.91 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Las Palmas | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 2 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 8 |