Match statistics snapshot
- Lask Linz created the clearer chances on xG (1.16 vs 0.17, Δ 0.99).
- Lask Linz fired more attempts (18 vs 4 shots).
- Cercle Brugge was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lask Linz | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 1.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.17 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lask Linz | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 60% |
| 393Lead | Accurate passes | 175 |
| 518Lead | Total passes | 291 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lask Linz | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lask Linz | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.29 | Goals prevented | 0.29 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lask Linz | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |