Match statistics snapshot
- Liverpool created the clearer chances on xG (0.28 vs 2.22, Δ 1.94).
- Liverpool fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- Liverpool was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lask Linz | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 0.28 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.22Lead |
| 6 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lask Linz | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 172 | Accurate passes | 451Lead |
| 257 | Total passes | 546Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lask Linz | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lask Linz | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lask Linz | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.