Match statistics snapshot
- Lausanne created the clearer chances on xG (1.35 vs 0.65, Δ 0.70).
- FC Zurich fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- FC Zurich held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lausanne | Statistic | Fc Zurich |
|---|---|---|
| 1.35Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.65 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lausanne | Statistic | Fc Zurich |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 244 | Accurate passes | 318Lead |
| 352 | Total passes | 405Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lausanne | Statistic | Fc Zurich |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lausanne | Statistic | Fc Zurich |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lausanne | Statistic | Fc Zurich |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.