Match statistics snapshot
- Lausanne created the clearer chances on xG (2.76 vs 1.07, Δ 1.69).
- Lausanne fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Lausanne was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 10%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lausanne | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 2.76Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.07 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lausanne | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 330Lead | Accurate passes | 268 |
| 437Lead | Total passes | 361 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lausanne | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lausanne | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lausanne | Statistic | Grasshoppers |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.