Match statistics snapshot
- Clermont Foot fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Laval was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Laval | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 5Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Laval | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 378 | Accurate passes | 396Lead |
| 426 | Total passes | 460Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Laval | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Laval | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Laval | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |