Match statistics snapshot
- LDU de Quito created the clearer chances on xG (2.15 vs 0.82, Δ 1.33).
- LDU de Quito fired more attempts (26 vs 7 shots).
- Junior was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Junior |
|---|---|---|
| 2.15Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.82 |
| Offsides | ||
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 26Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Junior |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 382Lead | Accurate passes | 158 |
| 457Lead | Total passes | 239 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Junior |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Junior |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Junior |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 3Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.