Match statistics snapshot
- Lanus was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 24%).
- LDU de Quito held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target |
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 17 | Total shots | 17 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 347Lead | Accurate passes | 151 |
| 419Lead | Total passes | 219 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Corner kicks | 8 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |