Match statistics snapshot
- LDU de Quito fired more attempts (21 vs 7 shots).
- Manta FC was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 43%).
- LDU de Quito held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Manta Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Manta Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 447Lead | Accurate passes | 202 |
| 519Lead | Total passes | 273 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Manta Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Manta Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Manta Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |