Match statistics snapshot
- LDU de Quito created the clearer chances on xG (0.67 vs 0.53, Δ 0.14).
- LDU de Quito fired more attempts (18 vs 5 shots).
- Mirassol was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 28%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 0.67Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.53 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 250 | Accurate passes | 437Lead |
| 308 | Total passes | 497Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -1.33 | Goals prevented | -1.33 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.