Match statistics snapshot
- LDU de Quito fired more attempts (19 vs 5 shots).
- Sao Paulo was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 37%).
- Sao Paulo held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 311 | Accurate passes | 398Lead |
| 366 | Total passes | 450Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ldu De Quito | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.