Match statistics snapshot
- Le Havre created the clearer chances on xG (1.20 vs 0.91, Δ 0.29).
- Clermont Foot fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Clermont Foot held more of the ball (68% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Le Havre | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 1.20Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.91 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Le Havre | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 208 | Accurate passes | 548Lead |
| 291 | Total passes | 629Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Le Havre | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Le Havre | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Le Havre | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.