Match statistics snapshot
- Le Havre created the clearer chances on xG (1.75 vs 1.55, Δ 0.20).
- Le Havre fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Lens was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Le Havre | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 1.75Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.55 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Le Havre | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 286 | Accurate passes | 486Lead |
| 373 | Total passes | 581Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Le Havre | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Le Havre | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Le Havre | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.