Match statistics snapshot
- Lens created the clearer chances on xG (1.99 vs 2.79, Δ 0.80).
- Lens fired more attempts (25 vs 8 shots).
- Le Havre was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 28%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Le Havre | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 1.99 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.79Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 22Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 25Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Le Havre | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 30% | Ball possession | 70%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 167 | Accurate passes | 476Lead |
| 247 | Total passes | 575Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Le Havre | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Le Havre | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 1.51 | Goals prevented | 1.51 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Le Havre | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.