Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (0.67 vs 1.34, Δ 0.67).
- Lecce fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Como held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lecce | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 0.67 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.34Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 3 |
| 4Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lecce | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 204 | Accurate passes | 301Lead |
| 277 | Total passes | 380Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lecce | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lecce | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| 0.96 | Goals prevented | 0.96 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lecce | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |