Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (0.76 vs 1.63, Δ 0.87).
- Como fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Como held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lecce | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 0.76 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.63Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lecce | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 207 | Accurate passes | 395Lead |
| 281 | Total passes | 462Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lecce | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lecce | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 1.07 | Goals prevented | 1.07 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lecce | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 24 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |