Match statistics snapshot
- Lecce created the clearer chances on xG (1.60 vs 1.06, Δ 0.54).
- Cremonese fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- Cremonese was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lecce | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 1.60Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.06 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lecce | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 70%Lead |
| 177 | Accurate passes | 250Lead |
| 258 | Total passes | 355Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lecce | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lecce | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.35 | Goals prevented | -0.35 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lecce | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 19Lead | Fouls | 27 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |