Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea W fired more attempts (28 vs 2 shots).
- Leicester City WFC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 21%).
- Chelsea W held more of the ball (71% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Leicester City Wfc | Statistic | Chelsea W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 23Lead |
| 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Total shots | 28Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Leicester City Wfc | Statistic | Chelsea W |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 172 | Accurate passes | 533Lead |
| 258 | Total passes | 625Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Leicester City Wfc | Statistic | Chelsea W |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 20Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Leicester City Wfc | Statistic | Chelsea W |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 11Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Leicester City Wfc | Statistic | Chelsea W |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |