Match statistics snapshot
- Lens created the clearer chances on xG (2.31 vs 0.23, Δ 2.08).
- Lens fired more attempts (12 vs 6 shots).
- Lens was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lens | Statistic | Ajaccio |
|---|---|---|
| 2.31Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.23 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lens | Statistic | Ajaccio |
|---|---|---|
| 79%Lead | Ball possession | 21% |
| 92%Lead | Pass accuracy | 62% |
| 677Lead | Accurate passes | 123 |
| 739Lead | Total passes | 197 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lens | Statistic | Ajaccio |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lens | Statistic | Ajaccio |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| Goalkeeper saves |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lens | Statistic | Ajaccio |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.