Match statistics snapshot
- Lens fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
- Clermont Foot was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lens | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| 5Lead |
| 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lens | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 347 | Accurate passes | 357Lead |
| 417 | Total passes | 431Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lens | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lens | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lens | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 17Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.