Match statistics snapshot
- Lens created the clearer chances on xG (1.91 vs 0.67, Δ 1.24).
- Lens fired more attempts (17 vs 8 shots).
- Lens was more accurate in front of goal (24% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lens | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 1.91Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.67 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lens | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 350 | Accurate passes | 371Lead |
| 432 | Total passes | 472Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lens | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lens | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lens | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |