Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (0.85 vs 4.33, Δ 3.48).
- Como fired more attempts (18 vs 11 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 27%).
Lens vs Como
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lens | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 0.85 | Expected goals (xG) | 4.33Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 12Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
| 11 | Total shots | 18Lead |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lens | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 410 | Accurate passes | 591Lead |
| 471 | Total passes | 646Lead |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lens | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lens | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lens | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Other
Additional tracked metrics for this fixture.
| Lens | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Free Kicks | 12Lead |