Match statistics snapshot
- Le Havre created the clearer chances on xG (0.98 vs 1.93, Δ 0.95).
- Lens fired more attempts (18 vs 11 shots).
- Lens was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lens | Statistic | Le Havre |
|---|---|---|
| 0.98 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.93Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lens | Statistic | Le Havre |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 409Lead | Accurate passes | 278 |
| 507Lead | Total passes | 386 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lens | Statistic | Le Havre |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lens | Statistic | Le Havre |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lens | Statistic | Le Havre |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.