Match statistics snapshot
- Lens created the clearer chances on xG (1.88 vs 1.44, Δ 0.44).
- Lens fired more attempts (20 vs 8 shots).
- Le Havre was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 35%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lens | Statistic | Le Havre |
|---|---|---|
| 1.88Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.44 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lens | Statistic | Le Havre |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 525Lead | Accurate passes | 209 |
| 594Lead | Total passes | 262 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lens | Statistic | Le Havre |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lens | Statistic | Le Havre |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.04 | Goals prevented | -0.04 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lens | Statistic | Le Havre |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.