Match statistics snapshot
- Lens created the clearer chances on xG (1.96 vs 1.70, Δ 0.26).
- Lens fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
- Lille held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lens | Statistic | Lille |
|---|---|---|
| 1.96Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.70 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lens | Statistic | Lille |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 310 | Accurate passes | 411Lead |
| 386 | Total passes | 502Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lens | Statistic | Lille |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lens | Statistic | Lille |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lens | Statistic | Lille |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |