Match statistics snapshot
- Lens created the clearer chances on xG (2.04 vs 0.28, Δ 1.76).
- Lens fired more attempts (31 vs 2 shots).
- Metz was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 32%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lens | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 2.04Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.28 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 21Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 31Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lens | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 75%Lead | Ball possession | 25% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 614Lead | Accurate passes | 158 |
| 699Lead | Total passes | 238 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lens | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lens | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 10Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lens | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |