Match statistics snapshot
- Lens created the clearer chances on xG (2.75 vs 0.40, Δ 2.35).
- Lens fired more attempts (24 vs 5 shots).
- Lens was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lens | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 2.75Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.40 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 19Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lens | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 427Lead | Accurate passes | 401 |
| 487Lead | Total passes | 469 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lens | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lens | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.96 | Goals prevented | -0.96 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lens | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |