Match statistics snapshot
- Lens created the clearer chances on xG (1.27 vs 1.10, Δ 0.17).
- Lens fired more attempts (17 vs 7 shots).
- Montpellier was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lens | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 1.27Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.10 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lens | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 444Lead | Accurate passes | 347 |
| 503Lead | Total passes | 421 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lens | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lens | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -1.47 | Goals prevented | -1.47 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lens | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |